Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Airport Grants Local Match topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee adopts substitute reducing local match for airport grants in economically disadvantaged counties

3464593 · May 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A committee substitute to House Bill 4520 would lower state airport grant local match from 10% to 5% for airports located in counties that meet the bill's economically disadvantaged definition; the substitute clarifies that projects already appropriated by the legislature still must meet the appropriate match requirement.

Chairman Nichols presented a committee substitute to House Bill 4520 to the Senate Committee on Transportation that would lower the local match requirement for certain state airport grants from 10% to 5% for airports located in an economically disadvantaged county.

The committee substitute clarifies that if a project is specifically appropriated by the legislature, the project still must provide the 5% local match if it qualifies as economically disadvantaged or the 10% match if it does not. "Some of these counties just do not have the funds to do that," Chairman Nichols said, describing the policy as a targeted relief similar to a previous highway program change.

Dan Hartman of TxDOT was present as a resource witness. The committee adopted the substitute and voted to report the bill favorably; the committee recorded a favorable report and recommended the bill to the local uncontested calendar.

Why it matters: supporters said lowering the match would help smaller, economically disadvantaged counties access state grants for airport projects; the substitute kept the legislative appropriation condition intact to preserve appropriations oversight.

What remains: the bill moves to the Senate calendar for additional consideration and any fiscal implications or eligibility definitions may be further debated.