Superintendent Shelley presented a draft organizational chart and multi-district salary study, proposing role shifts and asking the board to consider long-term structural changes.
District staff presented winter I-Ready results showing growth in many grades and highlighted continuing gaps for English learners and low-socioeconomic students. Board members asked for end-of-year grade-level achievement reporting and analysis of curriculum implementation and professional development effects.
The Richland School District board approved Form Package 217, the districts highly capable program grant application, after a lengthy discussion about program capacity, identification and equity. Board members moved and seconded the packet and voted to approve.
District staff presented a calendar for 2025-26 budget development emphasizing key legislative and revenue forecast dates and a timeline for department and building budget requests. Staff will publish a citizen's guide and aim for a preliminary budget to be available by July 10.
Finance staff reported a projected $412,000 increase to fund balance if current trends hold, while warning that the district is 76 students under budgeted enrollment and has received about 39.5% of apportionment revenue through January compared with 52.6% of the year completed.
The Richland School Board heard public praise for 3 Rivers HomeLink and agreed there will be no mergers or program closures for the 2025–26 school year. The district will form a fall work group, prioritize marketing and examine facility and funding partnerships as it explores expanding asynchronous online options.
Board discussed a proposed change from 1.5 miles to 2.0 miles for secondary home‑to‑school eligibility, examined effects on overcrowding and routes, and asked staff for a detailed cost/efficiency and safety analysis before any policy change is returned for consideration.
School board members reviewed sample balanced‑calendar options, discussed survey design and outreach to students and parents, and agreed to reconvene a committee and include clearer sample calendars and explanatory material in the next survey round.
District staff outlined progress at Tapteal’s two-way dual-language program, confirmed near 50/50 enrollment in some grades, and described plans to form a broader committee to study expansion, outreach and staffing constraints.
Finance staff described a recent federal pause and subsequent lifting of some program draws, outlined federal funding streams (including ESSER, Title I, special education and food service), and presented a multi‑year plan to rebuild the district’s fund balance through cost reductions and conservative budgeting.