The San Diego County Community Advisory Committee convened on December 5, 2024, to discuss critical energy issues, particularly the implications of nuclear energy in the region's power portfolio. The meeting highlighted the ongoing debate surrounding the use of Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant and its impact on the county's renewable energy goals.

Committee members expressed concerns about the reliance on nuclear energy, especially in light of California's commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. One member pointed out that while nuclear power does not emit greenhouse gases, it is often viewed as a \"dirty\" part of the energy mix due to public perception and safety concerns. The discussion included comparisons to Japan's energy transition post-Fukushima, where the shift to solar and wind energy faced significant challenges, leading to increased reliance on fossil fuels.

A significant point of contention was the financial implications of keeping Diablo Canyon operational. Estimates suggested that maintaining the plant could cost between $20 billion to $30 billion, a burden that would ultimately fall on California residents. Some committee members argued that investing in renewable energy sources like solar and wind could yield greater benefits than continuing to support nuclear energy.

The committee also discussed the allocation of nuclear energy credits, which would allow the county to report a higher percentage of carbon-free energy on its power content label. This move was seen as a way to balance affordability for consumers while transitioning towards more sustainable energy sources. However, some members questioned the ethics of including nuclear energy in the renewable energy conversation, emphasizing the need for transparency with consumers about the energy sources being utilized.

In conclusion, the meeting underscored the complexities of energy policy in San Diego County, particularly the balancing act between maintaining energy affordability, ensuring resource adequacy, and adhering to environmental goals. The committee plans to continue evaluating these issues, with further analysis expected in future meetings to guide decision-making on the region's energy strategy.