In a recent meeting of the San Diego Community Power (SDCP) Community Advisory Committee, members expressed strong concerns over a proposed energy procurement strategy that some believe contradicts the organization's core mission. The meeting, held on December 5, 2024, highlighted a growing tension between fiscal responsibility and environmental integrity.

As discussions unfolded, Committee Member Anderson voiced a passionate objection to the plan, arguing that it would undermine the SDCP's commitment to sustainable energy. \"This is as un-green as is possible,\" he stated, emphasizing the need for more reliable data on energy production from the San Onofre facility before moving forward. He described the proposal as a \"market for one of the most energy-intensive, wasteful, dirty sources of power,\" urging fellow members to vote against it.

The sentiment was echoed by other committee members, including Member Jones, who expressed frustration over the lack of clarity in the presentation. \"This is complicated stuff,\" he remarked, suggesting that the proposal felt rushed and lacked thorough discussion. He feared that approving it would be akin to \"rubber stamping\" a decision without adequate consideration.

In a show of solidarity, Committee Member Cutsenia proposed a motion to not recommend approval of the item, which received unanimous support. The committee's collective stance reflects a commitment to uphold the foundational values of the SDCP, which explicitly advises against nuclear energy procurement.

As the meeting concluded, the committee's decision underscored a pivotal moment for the SDCP, balancing the urgent need for energy solutions with a steadfast dedication to environmental principles. The outcome not only highlights the challenges faced in energy policy but also reinforces the importance of community voices in shaping a sustainable future for San Diego County.