During a recent council meeting, concerns were raised about the plans of PLK, a local business, and its financial practices. Community members expressed skepticism about PLK's claims that a community authority was always part of their plans. They questioned why PLK needed to wait for infrastructure improvements before engaging with the community.

Critics pointed out that other local businesses, like Surrey Square and Rookwood, manage their expenses effectively. They wondered why PLK could not do the same. A specific section of PLK's petition indicated that any community facilities they manage would be funded through community development charges. This led to speculation about whether PLK was facing financial difficulties.

The discussion also highlighted a proposed 2% fee that some council members attempted to classify as a fee rather than a sales tax. However, others, including council members Gerten and Breeden, argued that it should be considered a sales tax. This tax would not benefit the city but would instead provide financial support solely to PLK.

Concerns were raised about the state of the old Quality Inn site, which remains vacant and in disrepair. Some community members suggested that any approval of PLK's petition should be contingent on the redevelopment of this site, as it negatively impacts the area's appearance.

A historical reference was made to the Brookwood development, which was promoted as a family-friendly destination. However, the promised economic benefits did not materialize, leading to significant issues for residents, including the threat of eminent domain. This history served as a cautionary tale for the council as they consider PLK's current proposals.