During a recent government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the ongoing efforts of the Zoning Advisory Committee (ZAC) to update the village's zoning code, particularly its implications for the Historic District Commission (HDC). The vice chair of the HDC, Gary, expressed frustration over the lack of consultation with the commission during the drafting process. He stated that the HDC had not been involved in discussions about the proposed changes, contradicting claims made by ZAC Chairman Mark Erglein that stakeholder input had been sought.

Gary highlighted that the HDC had not received a copy of the draft zoning code, which he argued undermines the commission's authority and threatens the historic district's existence, established for 40 years. He criticized the process as flawed, suggesting it was driven by special interests rather than the community's needs and the comprehensive plan.

In response, another participant, Liz, emphasized the importance of transparency in the zoning process. She noted that while ZAC meetings have been public and materials accessible, the recent draft included significant sections that had not been previously discussed with committee members. Liz reiterated that transparency is a core commitment of the ZAC charter and should be upheld throughout the rezoning process.

The discussions underscore a growing tension between the HDC and the ZAC, raising questions about the inclusivity and transparency of the zoning code revision process, which affects all property owners in the village.