In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around the proposed amendment to include a new active ingredient, flupyridifuran, in the list of state restricted use pesticides. The proposal, presented by Scott Nishimoto from the Hawaii Department of Agriculture, aims to classify flupyridifuran as a restricted use pesticide (RUP) due to concerns about its potential to leach into groundwater.

The meeting began with a motion to defer the action on the proposal, which was supported by board member Diane and seconded by Brandy. The board agreed to hear public testimony before making a decision. Nishimoto explained that flupyridifuran is a systemic insecticide currently registered for use on various crops, and its addition to the restricted list is recommended pending the completion of a groundwater study.

Public testimony revealed significant concerns from stakeholders, particularly from the Hawaii Farm Bureau. Janet Ashman, representing the bureau, criticized the process leading to the proposal, highlighting a lack of orientation for new committee members and unanswered questions regarding the necessity and alternatives to flupyridifuran. She argued that the decision to restrict the pesticide was premature, especially given that the Environmental Protection Agency classifies it as a reduced-risk pesticide.

Other testimonies echoed similar sentiments. Greg Takashima, acting plant industry administrator, noted that while some states have restricted neonicotinoids, the restrictions are generally narrow and do not apply to agricultural use. Judson Laird, a large-scale agriculture professional, expressed concerns about the ecological impact of switching to older, less selective pesticides if flupyridifuran were restricted.

Matt Liam, a licensed pesticide applicator, emphasized the importance of using newer, more specific chemistries to combat invasive species and pests. He warned that placing flupyridifuran on the RUP list could hinder its use, despite its potential benefits when applied correctly.

The board is expected to consider the motion to defer the proposal after gathering more information and public input, reflecting the ongoing debate over pesticide regulation and environmental safety in Hawaii.