In a recent government meeting, the Norwood Board discussed a proposal for a $35,000 feasibility study aimed at assessing the historic lockup building, a structure dating back to the late 19th century. The study would focus on evaluating the building's condition and exploring potential rehabilitation options to preserve its historical significance. However, the proposal faced significant opposition from board members, who expressed concerns about the cost and the building's current utility.

Board member Mr. Plasco voiced his disapproval, arguing that the funds could be better allocated elsewhere, suggesting that the building's historical value does not justify the expenditure. He emphasized the need for the town to keep its options open for future uses of the space, which has primarily served as a storage facility for decades. Mr. Lane echoed these sentiments, proposing that any redevelopment of the site should be part of a broader town hall plan rather than a standalone study.

Despite the opposition, supporters of the study highlighted the lockup's unique historical context, noting that it was the first municipal building constructed in Norwood after its incorporation. They argued that preserving such structures is vital for maintaining the town's cultural heritage. Miss Estill, representing the historical society, underscored the lockup's significance, stating that it is a rare example of a Victorian-era penal facility and should be respected as part of the town's history.

The discussion also touched on the potential for adaptive reuse of the building, with suggestions that it could serve as a community space or office. However, the board ultimately voted to deny the application for the feasibility study, with a majority agreeing that the funds could be better spent on more pressing needs within the town.

In addition to the lockup discussion, the board briefly addressed a separate proposal for a $60,000 feasibility study for the old pumping station. Similar concerns were raised regarding the building's condition and the appropriateness of the proposed funding, with several members expressing skepticism about the value of investing in the site, which has been largely unused and is in disrepair.

The meeting concluded with a consensus that while the preservation of historical structures is important, the current proposals did not align with the town's immediate priorities or financial capabilities. The board agreed to explore alternative options for the lockup and pumping station in the future, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive plan for the town's unused properties.