Residents of Norwood voiced strong opposition during a recent Board of Selectmen meeting regarding a proposed 32-unit apartment complex at 929 Washington Street. Concerns centered around potential traffic congestion, environmental impacts, and the overall suitability of the project for the neighborhood.

Doris Dixon, a local resident, highlighted the risk of flooding associated with the development, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of stormwater management. She urged the board to reject the project, citing environmental damage as a significant concern.

Olin Hughes echoed these sentiments, pointing out that the existing traffic patterns in the area are already strained, particularly at the intersection of Washington and Chapel Streets. He warned that without substantial changes to traffic flow, the development could pose dangers to both current and future residents.

Colin Cukes formally expressed his opposition, arguing that the scale and density of the proposed apartments are inconsistent with the neighborhood's character. He called for public discussion on these issues before any decisions are made.

Other residents, including David Haglund and Elizabeth Hestad, raised similar objections, with Hestad suggesting that the project could be an opportunity to address existing traffic issues but cautioning that the current proposal may not be the best solution.

John King, a nearby homeowner, voiced concerns about the size of the building and its impact on his property, particularly regarding privacy and sunlight. He described the intersection as the worst in the area, further complicating the situation.

Brian Bumble, a property manager, criticized the project's scale, suggesting it feels like a \"cash grab\" rather than a genuine effort to provide affordable housing. He expressed a desire for developments that align more closely with the community's character.

Chris Bartschukar, who owns property adjacent to the proposed site, raised issues about visibility and the potential overshadowing of his business by the new construction. He questioned the project's compatibility with the neighborhood, referencing other successful developments in the area.

As the meeting concluded, it was clear that the proposed apartment complex has sparked significant concern among residents, who are calling for a thorough review of its implications for traffic, environmental impact, and community character before any further action is taken.