In a recent government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the formation of a proposed Lake District in Sawyer County, particularly focusing on the inequities in property representation and the potential financial burdens on local residents.

A speaker highlighted that two properties on Callahan Lake Road had a total of 11 signers for a petition, while 13 properties valued over $500,000, belonging to trust funds, were limited to one signature each. This discrepancy raised questions about fairness in representation, as the majority of petition signers were from Callahan Lake, with only 28% residing within the proposed Lake District.

The discussion also touched on the inclusion of landlocked properties, with eight on Mud Lake and 26 on Callahan Lake, which the speaker argued do not benefit from the Lake District. Additionally, properties located below the dam were included in the district despite lacking direct access to the lake, further complicating the rationale for their inclusion.

Concerns were amplified by Robert Johnson, a local resident, who expressed strong opposition to the establishment of any lake districts in the county. He argued that such districts could lead to significant financial liabilities for residents, potentially costing up to $2.2 million, including maintenance and operational expenses. Johnson criticized the process of boundary drawing, claiming it excluded businesses that benefit from the lake while imposing taxes on local residents.

The meeting underscored a growing divide between property owners within the proposed district and those outside it, with many residents feeling disenfranchised and concerned about the long-term implications of the Lake District's establishment. The discussions reflect a broader debate about land use, community governance, and the financial responsibilities of local residents in Sawyer County.