In a recent government meeting, members discussed the lack of communication from city officials regarding their concerns and proposals. The conversation began with a review of a previous letter sent to the mayor and city manager, which had gone unanswered. Participants expressed frustration over the lack of engagement from the mayor, suggesting that a more direct approach might be necessary.

One board member proposed that instead of waiting for a response, a small delegation should meet with the mayor to discuss their concerns directly. This suggestion stemmed from a belief that the board, established under the city charter, should not have to rely on public hearings to communicate with city leadership. The board members emphasized their role as appointed officials and questioned why their input seemed to be overlooked.

Additionally, there was concern about the awareness of the city council regarding the community police report, with members expressing doubt that council members were fully informed about its contents. The discussion also touched on recent budget proposals, specifically a suggestion to cut seven positions from the police department, which raised alarms among board members about the potential impact on community safety and services.

The meeting underscored a growing tension between appointed boards and elected officials, highlighting the need for improved communication and collaboration to address community issues effectively.