Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Controversial Greenwich Village renovation sparks heated debate

September 17, 2024 | Land Preservation Commission, New York City Board & Committees, New York City, New York County, New York


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Controversial Greenwich Village renovation sparks heated debate
In a recent meeting of the Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC), discussions centered around a proposed application for a certificate of appropriateness for 51 Barrow Street, located in the Greenwich Village Historic District. The application seeks to construct rooftop and rear yard additions, as well as to replace the rear facade of the historic row house, which dates back to 1826.

Commissioners expressed a mix of support and concern regarding the design elements presented. Notably, the proposed rear addition includes a rooftop bulkhead and mechanical equipment, which, according to the architect, would not be visible from any public thoroughfare. However, some commissioners raised issues about the scale and massing of the proposed changes, suggesting that the rear roof addition appeared overwhelming for the building's proportions.

The architect, Peter Miller, emphasized that the design was developed in consultation with LPC staff and an organization holding a facade easement on the property. He noted that the existing rear facade has undergone significant alterations over the years, which has led to structural concerns that necessitate a complete reconstruction of the rear wall.

Public testimony included support from the Victorian Society of New York, which acknowledged the need for reconstruction due to visible deterioration but criticized the proposed symmetrical design as inconsistent with the informal character of the block. Similarly, the Historic Districts Council expressed general support for the massing of the addition but recommended the use of clapboard instead of brick for the rear facade, arguing that the original timber framing should be preserved.

The Manhattan Community Board 2 also recommended approval of the window repairs and the rear extension, contingent upon proper engineering studies and notifications to adjacent property owners regarding construction plans.

As the meeting concluded, the LPC indicated that further review of the design would be necessary, particularly concerning the facade materials and the overall aesthetic alignment with the historic character of the neighborhood. The commission's decision will ultimately shape the future of this historic property and its integration within the Greenwich Village landscape.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New York articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI