In a recent government meeting, a 75-year-old resident expressed deep frustration over city regulations that could force her and a disabled tenant to leave their home. The resident, who has lived in her house for many years, argued that the city of Syracuse is requiring her to install a costly driveway and remove her existing front entrance to accommodate a new shed-like structure, which she insists is not a garage.

The proposed changes, which would cost an estimated $50,000, have raised concerns not only for her but also for Louise Grosso, a long-term resident with disabilities who relies on access to the front of the house. The resident highlighted that the new regulations would hinder access for disabled individuals, as they would be unable to enter the home without a front entrance.

During her testimony, she recounted a dismissive response from a city official, who allegedly stated, \"I don't care,\" when she mentioned her disability. This interaction has fueled her belief that the city's approach is unfair and lacks consideration for the needs of vulnerable residents.

Additionally, she pointed out that neighbors and residents from nearby streets have received notifications from the city regarding the situation, further complicating the matter and causing unnecessary distress. The resident emphasized that the shed is a removable structure and questioned the rationale behind the city's demands, calling for a more compassionate and reasonable approach to housing regulations.