Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Controversial Pool Proposal Sparks Environmental Concerns

September 25, 2024 | Princeton, Mercer County, New Jersey


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Controversial Pool Proposal Sparks Environmental Concerns
In a recent municipal meeting, the board discussed a proposal for a new swimming pool at a residential property located within a 300-foot riparian buffer zone in Princeton. The application, presented by attorney Ryan Kennedy, seeks a variance to allow the pool's placement, which is currently proposed at a distance of 105 feet from the front yard, significantly less than the required setback of over 307 feet.

The project has been reviewed and approved by the municipal land use engineer for stormwater management, and it utilizes a permit by rule under the New Jersey Flood Hazard Area Control Act. However, the removal of four trees, including two dead cedars, one dead ash, and one live silver maple, is necessary for the pool's construction. The silver maple will require a replacement tree, and the applicant must secure a permit from the municipal arborist for the tree removals.

During the meeting, the property owner, Elizabeth Gonzales, emphasized the unique environmental features of the lot, which includes mature trees and a well-maintained landscape. She expressed concerns about placing the pool in a location that would disturb her neighbors or compromise the natural beauty of the property. The proposed site was chosen to minimize the impact on the environment and maintain privacy from neighboring homes.

Board members raised questions regarding the environmental constraints of the property, particularly the proximity to a C1 stream and the associated permitting challenges. Experts indicated that while it is technically possible to build closer to the stream, obtaining the necessary permits would be extremely difficult, if not impossible.

The board ultimately acknowledged the thoughtful consideration given to the pool's placement, balancing the need for compliance with environmental regulations and the desire to maintain the aesthetic and ecological integrity of the property. The discussion concluded with a general consensus that the proposed location for the pool is one of the least objectionable options available, given the unique constraints of the site. The board will continue deliberations in an executive session to finalize their decision on the variance request.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Jersey articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI