In a recent government meeting, officials deliberated on a contentious request for a variance to construct a six-foot fence in the front yard of a property adjacent to a busy street and the Meramec River. The discussion highlighted the unique characteristics of the lot, including its proximity to the river and the increased noise levels from traffic, particularly on rainy days.

The board members grappled with the criteria for granting a variance, which requires demonstrating unique circumstances that do not apply to neighboring properties. Some members expressed skepticism, noting that many streets in the area experience similar noise levels and that the existing zoning ordinance aims to prevent wall-like structures in front yards. One member emphasized that a four-foot fence would suffice for safety, while another argued that the property’s location warranted special consideration due to the heavy traffic and potential dangers posed to children.

Supporters of the variance pointed to the lot's unique position near a bridge and the associated safety concerns, arguing that a taller fence would provide necessary protection. They contended that the property’s characteristics justified the request, despite the challenges in meeting the strict variance criteria.

As the meeting concluded, the board members remained divided on the issue, reflecting broader concerns about balancing safety, community standards, and zoning regulations. The outcome of this deliberation will have implications for future requests and the interpretation of zoning laws in the area.