In a recent government meeting, tensions flared over the allocation of $3 million from the city manager, originally sourced from toll bridge revenues. One commissioner expressed frustration over the lack of clarity regarding the use of these funds, questioning whether they could be directed towards street improvements or utility rebates. The commissioner highlighted ongoing confusion about the city’s financial decisions, particularly concerning a reported $2.1 million donation for affordable housing, which they argued was misrepresented as a city contribution when it actually came from the state of Michigan.

The discussion also touched on the nature of the affordable housing projects being developed, with the commissioner asserting that the term \"affordable living\" was misleading, as the projects in question did not cater to low-income residents. They emphasized that the apartments being constructed were more aligned with market rates rather than truly affordable options.

City officials clarified that while the new apartments fall within city boundaries, the funding and management are under county jurisdiction. They reiterated that the city had no direct involvement in the county's housing initiatives, despite public statements suggesting otherwise. The meeting concluded with a call for transparency regarding the city’s financial dealings and a demand for accountability in how public funds are utilized.