Sheriff faces censure amid election misconduct allegations

November 12, 2024 | Pima County, Arizona


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Sheriff faces censure amid election misconduct allegations
During a recent Pima County Board of Supervisors meeting, significant discussions emerged regarding the implications of the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) ending, the approval of funding for affordable housing, and a contentious motion to investigate Sheriff Nanos.

The board acknowledged that plans for state-level initiatives were developed while the ACP was still in effect, and the discontinuation of this program raises concerns about sustainability and cost management for states moving forward.

In a separate agenda item, the board unanimously approved a $1 million funding agreement with La Frontera Partners to support the West Point 2 Apartments project, aimed at providing affordable housing for older community members. This decision reflects ongoing efforts to address housing gaps in the region.

However, the most heated discussion centered around a motion proposed by Supervisor Hines to censure Sheriff Nanos and request an investigation into his actions. Hines criticized the sheriff for allegedly using his position to undermine a political rival during the election period, claiming it violated fundamental democratic principles. He called for an investigation by the Arizona Attorney General and the U.S. Attorney for Arizona, citing potential violations of federal statutes protecting political campaigns.

The board's legal counsel clarified that while they could express their displeasure regarding the sheriff's actions, they lacked the authority to formally censure an elected official. This led to a debate about the appropriate course of action, with some supervisors advocating for a resolution of disapproval rather than a formal censure.

Ultimately, the board voted unanimously to refer the matter for criminal review and investigation, emphasizing the need for accountability in the sheriff's office. The discussion highlighted concerns about the integrity of public office and the importance of maintaining trust in local governance.

In addition to these discussions, the board addressed procedural matters, including the appointment process for a constable position and the approval of a memorandum of agreement with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for wildlife partnership initiatives. The meeting concluded with a focus on ensuring transparency and accountability in county operations.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Comments

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Arizona articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI