In a recent government meeting, residents of Washington County expressed strong opposition to a proposed ordinance that would significantly alter the county's land use and development policies. The ordinance aims to transform rural highways into commercial strips, a move critics argue threatens the agricultural and residential character of the area.

One resident, voicing concerns about the plan, highlighted the original intent of the \"2 and 6 Washington County Plan for Land Use and Development,\" which emphasizes the preservation of the county's rural nature. The speaker criticized the current proposal as a departure from these values, suggesting it prioritizes commercial interests over the well-being of local communities. They raised questions about the motivations behind the ordinance, speculating that it may serve special interests rather than the residents' desires.

The speaker urged the county officials to reconsider the plan, advocating for a more measured approach that respects the rights of landowners and maintains the county's aesthetic appeal. They proposed breaking the lengthy ordinance into smaller, more manageable pieces for better public understanding and engagement.

In addition to land use concerns, another resident, Lindsey Mast, called for the reinstatement of funding for the Washington County legal help desk, which was cut from the 2024 budget. Mast, a law student, emphasized the desk's role in providing essential legal services to low-income residents and improving judicial efficiency. She argued that restoring funding would significantly benefit the community by ensuring access to justice for all, particularly those unable to afford private legal representation.

The meeting underscored a growing tension between development interests and community values in Washington County, as residents seek to protect their rural heritage while navigating the complexities of economic growth.