In a recent government meeting, officials discussed concerns regarding a newly erected fence along Pastures Lane, which has drawn criticism for its height and visibility. The fence, measuring eight feet tall, is positioned just 23 feet from the road, significantly less than the required 45-foot front yard setback. This discrepancy has raised questions about compliance with local zoning regulations, specifically sections 6.5c2 and 6.5c4, which outline acceptable fence heights and design standards.

Critics argue that the fence does not blend with the natural landscape, as mandated by the regulations. They highlighted that the fence is overly visible and does not meet the criteria for being in a \"wooded area\" or \"natural landscape.\" The use of dark-colored posts, which were recently installed, has been described as even more offensive to the aesthetic of the area compared to the lighter posts that were previously in place.

Additionally, concerns were raised about the placement of the fence in relation to newly planted trees. Critics noted that the fence could have been positioned behind the trees to minimize visibility, suggesting that the current placement was intentional to expose the fence to neighboring properties.

During the meeting, it was clarified that while a building permit is not required for fences, compliance with zoning regulations is necessary. The discussion also touched on the need for a special permit if the fence does not meet the zoning exceptions.

The board members acknowledged the fence's prominent visibility and its deviation from typical deer fencing designs, which are generally less obtrusive. The conversation underscored the ongoing debate about property aesthetics and zoning compliance in the community, with officials considering the implications of the fence's design and placement on neighborhood standards.