During a recent government meeting, commissioners raised significant concerns regarding the proposed expansion of the Residential Multi-family (RM) ordinance, emphasizing the need for thorough vetting before any decisions are made. One commissioner highlighted a notable contradiction in zoning regulations, pointing out that while constructing a simple storage shed over 200 square feet requires a permit and adherence to strict height and setback regulations, the proposed RM zoning could allow for a 50-foot apartment building to be built just 10 feet from residential property lines.

The discussion centered around the implications of allowing such developments without proper scrutiny, particularly in light of existing residential areas. The commissioner argued for a shift towards recommending a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) designation instead, which would provide greater control over the development process and ensure community input. This approach would allow for a more tailored development plan that aligns with the needs and expectations of the community.

Concerns were also raised about the lack of connectivity in the proposed developments, with fears that new subdivisions could become isolated \"density islands\" without adequate access to transportation routes. The absence of designated streets in the master transportation plan for the area further complicated the discussion, as it raised questions about future traffic flow and accessibility.

The meeting concluded with a consensus on the importance of revisiting the proposed RM designation and considering the RPUD as a more suitable alternative. This would not only allow for community engagement in the planning process but also ensure that developments are in line with the established zoning codes that have already been vetted and refined over time. The commissioners agreed to further explore the implications of these zoning changes in future meetings.