In a recent government meeting, officials discussed the complexities surrounding a joint development agreement between Far West City and Marriott Slaterville. The agreement, which has already been approved by Marriott Slaterville, has raised concerns among Far West officials regarding its implications and the timeline for development.

One key point of contention was the language in the agreement that states if Far West does not approve the agreement, the developer would have no further obligations to the city. This has led to confusion and concern among council members about the potential consequences of delaying their decision. Some officials expressed frustration over the lack of communication regarding the development process, noting that they had not received updates for months.

The meeting highlighted the unique nature of the joint development agreement, as it involves two cities working together on a single project. Officials acknowledged the challenges of coordinating between different meeting schedules and processes, which could complicate the approval and execution of the agreement.

Concerns were also raised about the potential for prioritizing development in Marriott Slaterville over Far West, with officials questioning how the developer would balance projects in both cities. The developer assured the council that market demands would drive the development process, and there would be financial incentives for both cities through a fee-sharing arrangement.

Several council members voiced their desire to table the vote on the agreement to seek further clarification on various aspects, including zoning and the responsibilities of the cities involved. They emphasized the importance of ensuring that the agreement serves the best interests of their constituents before moving forward.

As the meeting concluded, the future of the development agreement remained uncertain, with officials committed to addressing the concerns raised and ensuring a thorough review before any final decisions are made.