In a recent government meeting, the Planning Commission addressed two significant applications, including a re-subdivision and a special use permit for a proposed parking lot at 123 Ashworth Place.

The first item on the agenda was the approval of a re-subdivision for property located at 1154143 South Avenue, which was passed with the condition that the applicant must apply for a driveway permit prior to construction.

The more contentious discussion revolved around the special use permit sought by AP Land Holdings, LLC, represented by Terry Horst, to establish a parking lot on a currently vacant lot. The proposal includes the construction of 19 parking spaces, a privacy fence, solar lights, and bike racks, intended primarily for overflow parking for nearby student housing.

During the meeting, several concerns were raised by local residents. Bobby Galden, a neighbor, expressed strong opposition, citing issues related to increased traffic, noise, and potential crime associated with the parking lot. He highlighted existing problems with crime in the area, including thefts from vehicles and disturbances from transient individuals. Galden emphasized the negative impact on the quality of life for residents, particularly the elderly and those with health concerns.

Another resident, Alexander Marion, the city auditor, also opposed the application, arguing that Syracuse does not need more parking lots. He advocated for better land use, suggesting that the space could be utilized for housing or green areas instead. Marion pointed out that parking lots contribute to urban heat and do not promote a walkable community.

In response to the concerns, the applicant assured that security measures, including cameras and controlled access, would be implemented. However, the discussion highlighted a broader debate about urban development priorities in Syracuse, with residents advocating for sustainable and community-friendly solutions rather than additional parking infrastructure.

The Planning Commission is expected to deliberate further on the application, weighing the community's concerns against the proposed benefits of the parking lot.