Court blocks penalties for Native Hawaiian cultural practitioners

November 01, 2024 | Task Force Created by Act 170, Executive , Hawaii


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Court blocks penalties for Native Hawaiian cultural practitioners
In a recent government meeting, significant discussions centered around the legal challenges faced by Native Hawaiian cultural practitioners in midwifery and traditional birthing practices. The Native Hawaiian Legal Corporation, represented by litigation director Karsha Durant, highlighted a lawsuit filed against the State of Hawaii regarding the restrictive nature of Hawaii Revised Statute 457 j, which regulates midwifery. This law has been criticized for failing to adequately protect traditional practices, particularly for Native Hawaiians, as it currently allows for civil and criminal penalties against various birth professionals, including doulas and cultural practitioners.

Durant explained that the lawsuit, Kaho'ohano versus State of Hawaii, was initiated in February 2023 and included a request for a preliminary injunction to prevent the enforcement of penalties while the case is pending. The court's ruling on July 23 granted this injunction, blocking the state from imposing penalties on practitioners of traditional Hawaiian healing practices related to prenatal, maternal, and child care. The court found that the existing law created a \"chilling effect\" on these practices, threatening their continuation and violating constitutional protections for cultural practices.

The court's decision emphasized the importance of allowing cultural practitioners to practice, teach, and learn traditional methods without the fear of legal repercussions. It noted that the law's provisions, which were intended to protect traditional practices, had failed in practice, leading to irreparable harm to practitioners and the loss of cultural knowledge. The ruling also pointed out that the pathways for practitioners to gain recognition and protection under the law were unreasonable, often requiring them to pursue education that did not align with traditional practices.

As the case moves toward a trial set for January 2026, the implications of this ruling could significantly impact the future of traditional midwifery and cultural practices in Hawaii, highlighting the ongoing struggle for recognition and protection of Native Hawaiian traditions within the legal framework.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Comments

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Hawaii articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI