In a recent court hearing, attorney Diana Spanos, representing the appellant mother, raised concerns regarding the proceedings of a trial that she claims were rushed. Spanos stated that while the mother did not contest her current fitness as a parent, she believes that both the department and the court expedited the judgment process, potentially undermining the fairness of the case. This assertion highlights ongoing discussions about the judicial system's handling of family law cases and the importance of thorough evaluations in determining parental fitness. The implications of such claims could lead to further scrutiny of procedural practices within the court system.