During a recent city council meeting, a significant discussion arose regarding the approval of a check register totaling approximately $8.3 million. Council member Lewis expressed her concerns about the legitimacy of certain checks, particularly those made out to individuals rather than corporations. She indicated that she could not support the approval until she had the opportunity to discuss her questions with the acting financial director, Brent Keoughan.

Lewis's request for clarification on the checks led to a debate about the implications of not approving the register. Keoughan highlighted that the California government code requires three affirmative votes for financial matters, meaning Lewis's dissent could prevent the city from paying its bills, which he described as a \"big problem.\"

The council members engaged in a back-and-forth discussion about the necessity of transparency and communication regarding financial transactions. Lewis emphasized her historical access to financial information and expressed frustration over the current process, which she felt limited her ability to obtain necessary details before voting.

Despite the urgency of the situation, the council ultimately decided to postpone the vote on the check register until Lewis could compile her questions and receive the needed information. The meeting underscored the tension between fiscal responsibility and the need for accountability in municipal financial practices, as council members navigated the complexities of governance and public trust.