During a recent board meeting, a heated discussion emerged regarding the treatment of board member Darnika's emails, raising concerns about fairness and the board's priorities. One member expressed frustration over the perception that the board was unfairly targeting Darnika, suggesting that if actions were to be taken against her, similar scrutiny should apply to other members who have made controversial statements on social media.

The member emphasized the need for consistency in applying policies, questioning whether any formal requests had been made for Darnika to delete her emails, which were deemed inappropriate by some. The sentiment was clear: if the board was to enforce standards, it should do so uniformly across all members.

Moreover, the member criticized the decision to prioritize this issue in the meeting, arguing that it detracted from more pressing matters at hand, particularly with a new superintendent set to join the board soon. The implication was that focusing on Darnika's emails could be seen as a distraction from the board's responsibilities and could undermine its credibility.

The discussion highlighted the ongoing challenges of governance and accountability within the board, as members grapple with the implications of their actions and the need for a cohesive approach to policy enforcement.