During a recent government meeting, discussions centered on the need for reform in local development regulations, particularly concerning rural cluster subdivisions. A key speaker emphasized the importance of restoring local control over development processes, arguing that simply eliminating by-right cluster subdivisions would not halt development. Instead, landowners would still retain the ability to develop one unit by right in designated zoning districts (R1, R2, and R4).

The speaker highlighted the controversy surrounding two rural cluster subdivisions developed in the past year, noting that the lack of public hearings limited meaningful community input. Currently, public comments are not solicited during the planning commission's review of these subdivisions, which must be approved if they meet existing ordinance requirements. The speaker expressed concern that this process deprives county residents of their right to voice opinions on developments that affect their communities.

To address these issues, the speaker urged the approval of ZTA 2,405, which would transition rural cluster subdivisions from a by-right use to a special use permit. This change would allow for public hearings and greater community involvement in the decision-making process, enabling residents to express their support or opposition to proposed developments.

The meeting also featured comments from James Kelly, a resident of a rural cluster subdivision, who defended the benefits of such developments, asserting they do not contribute to light pollution or other negative externalities. The discussions reflect a growing call for more inclusive and transparent development practices in the county, ensuring that local voices are heard in shaping their environment.