In a recent government meeting, the proposal for a modified conditional use permit (CUP) for a multifamily development on South Locust Grove was discussed, highlighting significant changes to the original plan. The applicant seeks to alter the approved CUP, which initially allowed for 36 two-bedroom apartments, to a new configuration of 18 one-bedroom and 18 two-bedroom units. This redesign reduces the number of buildings from eight garden-style apartments to three climate-controlled structures, while also increasing the common open space from the required 9,000 square feet to 16,664 square feet.

The proposed development includes various amenities such as an outdoor clubhouse, picnic areas, and bike storage facilities, aimed at enhancing the quality of life for residents. The architectural design features a mix of EIFS siding and metal accents, adhering to the city's design standards.

However, the proposal has faced scrutiny from neighboring residents, particularly regarding access and safety concerns. A resident from the adjacent property expressed apprehension about a proposed cross-access walkway that would lead directly onto her property, raising fears about safety and potential flooding issues due to drainage changes. The resident emphasized that previous commitments to install a closed vision fence and landscaping had not been fulfilled by neighboring developments, leading to a lack of trust in the current proposal.

In response, the applicant's representative acknowledged the concerns and suggested that the cross-access requirement could be reconsidered, proposing to move the access point closer to Locust Grove to minimize impact on the neighboring property. The discussion also touched on the possibility of enhancing the height of the boundary fence to provide better security and privacy for the resident.

The planning staff recommended approval of the modified CUP with conditions, but the commission deliberated on whether to continue the hearing to allow for further discussions between the applicant and the concerned resident. Ultimately, the commission recognized the need for a balance between facilitating development and addressing the valid concerns of neighboring property owners.

As the meeting concluded, the commission was left to decide on the next steps, weighing the benefits of the proposed development against the need for community safety and integration. The outcome of this proposal remains pending as further discussions are anticipated.