In a recent government meeting, significant discussions centered around a proposed development project that seeks to deviate from established design guidelines outlined in the 10 Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan. The applicant has requested that the council allow alternate design standards and a unique design review process, arguing that their proposal generally aligns with the intent of the existing guidelines.

However, city staff expressed strong opposition to the proposed map amendment and rezone, citing that the conceptual development plan fails to meet the minimum standards set forth in the 10 Mile Plan. Staff emphasized that the proposal does not provide the desired mix of integrated uses for the designated mixed-use areas, which are crucial for the area's development.

During the public hearing, several representatives from the applicant's team testified in favor of the project, while no one spoke against it at the meeting. Nonetheless, written testimonies from community members raised concerns about potential traffic congestion, particularly at the intersections of 10 Mile Road and I-84, as well as the preservation of existing trees in the area.

The commission acknowledged that the 10 Mile Plan, established 17 years ago, may be outdated and suggested a need for a refresh to better reflect current conditions. Despite this, they agreed with staff that the proposed development plan does not align with the existing guidelines. The commission ultimately recommended that the city council approve the staff's alternative future land use map designations and zoning.

An outstanding issue remains regarding the applicant's refusal to submit a phasing plan for the development, which would clarify the timing of necessary infrastructure improvements. Since the commission hearing, the city has received 13 letters opposing the project, highlighting concerns over traffic, school capacity, and the adequacy of local infrastructure.

As the council prepares to deliberate on the proposal, they face the challenge of balancing community concerns with the potential benefits of the development.