In a recent city council meeting, discussions centered around a proposed zoning change for the River's Edge development, which could significantly alter the landscape of the area along the Spokane River. The proposal aims to increase residential density from 384 to 680 units, replacing existing mini-storage facilities and single-family lots with additional apartments and a public trail along the river.

City officials noted that the project is expected to generate over 1,000 additional daily trips, with 94 morning and 50 evening peak hour trips. However, they assured that the current level of service would remain acceptable, and the development would not lead to excessive congestion.

The proposed zoning change would convert the northern half of the property from C-17 (commercial) to R-17 (medium to high density residential), while retaining some commercial zoning. This change is seen as a transition between low-density residential areas and commercial districts, providing a buffer along arterial streets.

Supporters of the project, including local trail advocates and community leaders, emphasized the importance of enhancing public access to the river. They highlighted the potential for a 1,600-foot-long, 16-foot-wide trail that would connect existing trails and provide recreational opportunities for residents and visitors alike. The proposed trail is expected to link the Atlas waterfront to future developments at Mill River, creating a vital corridor for biking and walking.

Critics of the current zoning expressed concerns about losing valuable waterfront access if the project is not approved. They argued that the proposed development would preserve public views and access to the river, which could otherwise be obstructed by private homes.

The council is set to consider the zoning change request, along with a development agreement that includes 28 conditions aimed at ensuring the project meets community needs. The decision will determine whether the city will move forward with the proposed changes or maintain the existing zoning, which allows for less public access and fewer housing options. Public testimony during the meeting indicated strong community interest in the outcome, with advocates urging the council to prioritize public access and affordable housing in their decision-making process.