During a recent government meeting, community members voiced strong opposition to proposed changes regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and impervious surface regulations, raising concerns about the potential impact on local neighborhoods and property rights.

Maria Cooper, a resident, expressed her disapproval of the current ADU proposals, emphasizing the need for a thorough discussion over the next year to allow all stakeholders to present their views. She argued that the rushed approach could undermine existing residential neighborhoods and called for the development of comprehensive zoning codes that protect community interests. Cooper also highlighted the importance of maintaining environmental protections, warning against relaxing regulations that safeguard local flora and fauna.

Leslie Davis shifted the focus to the issue of impervious surfaces, linking it to the stormwater tax. She urged officials to prioritize eliminating the transfer of water funds to the general fund before addressing definitions related to impervious surfaces, deeming any discussion premature without this foundational change.

Christine Rosman echoed the sentiments of her fellow residents, criticizing the county for hastily proposing changes that threaten private property rights. She lamented the lack of public engagement in the decision-making process and questioned the professionalism of the proposals, suggesting they were influenced by external organizations like the World Economic Forum. Rosman called for clearer definitions and limitations in the proposed changes to ensure transparency and protect homeowners.

The meeting underscored a growing frustration among residents regarding the perceived lack of consideration for community input in local governance, particularly concerning significant changes that could affect their neighborhoods and property rights.