In a recent court session, discussions centered around parenting time and safety concerns for children involved in ongoing custody disputes. The court considered a request for a no-contact clause between parents, with one party expressing feelings of unsafety. The judge noted that if necessary, the concerned party could seek a protective order through family services.

The court also addressed the need for supervised parenting time, particularly for a father whose visitation with his oldest child is under scrutiny due to allegations of domestic violence. The guardian ad litem (GAL) and other parties emphasized the importance of conducting a parenting time evaluation before any unsupervised visits could occur, citing the need to assess the mental health and safety of the children involved.

The judge acknowledged the complexities of the case, particularly regarding a child with severe autism, and indicated that any parenting time would need to be carefully structured to ensure the well-being of all children. The court discussed the potential for therapeutic supervised visits to help facilitate a healthier interaction between the parents and children.

Additionally, the court explored the possibility of utilizing Triangle Studios for services related to the case dynamics, although there were questions about existing contracts and payment issues. The judge instructed the involved parties to investigate this option further.

Overall, the court's focus remained on ensuring the safety and best interests of the children while navigating the challenging dynamics between the parents. The next steps will involve further evaluations and referrals to determine appropriate parenting arrangements moving forward.