In a recent court hearing, testimony revealed significant details regarding the interactions of a defendant, Mr. Conger, with minor children in violation of a child protective order. The discussions centered around a photograph taken at a diner in late March, which Mr. Conger confirmed was during a time he was prohibited from being with the children. When questioned about this violation, he acknowledged it but claimed he did not perceive the meeting as harmful, stating, \"I made the decision to meet them there and have dinner.\"

Mr. Conger detailed his limited interactions with the children, Alyssa and James, asserting that he had only seen them once between February 5 and July 4, 2024. He mentioned that he had been to the children's mother, Cassandra's, residence a few times for maintenance tasks but did not interact with the children during those visits, as they were typically at school or away.

The court also explored Mr. Conger's work schedule, revealing that he had requested time off around the same dates that Cassandra and the children went on vacation in June. However, he maintained that he was unaware of their vacation plans until shortly before it occurred, stating he had made arrangements to care for his parents' house during that time.

Additionally, Mr. Conger confirmed that he had been arrested within the last six months, although details surrounding the arrest were not disclosed during this session. The hearing continues to unfold as the court examines the implications of Mr. Conger's actions in relation to the protective order and the welfare of the children involved.