A public hearing was held to discuss a proposed rezone of the property located at 5428 South Highland Drive from R1-21 (Residential Single Family) to R2-10 (Residential Two Family). The applicant, represented by John Woolley, aims to revert the property back to its original two-parcel configuration, allowing for the sale of one residence while retaining the other.

The property, which is just under an acre, was previously two separate parcels before being combined by prior owners. The current proposal seeks to split the property again, with the front half being rezoned to R2-10 to comply with the Highland Drive Master Plan. This plan supports moderate income housing and encourages the preservation of open space by allowing for the construction of two dwelling units in one structure.

During the meeting, Keri Marsh from the planning staff presented the staff report, highlighting that the proposed zoning aligns with the surrounding area, which includes a mix of residential and commercial properties. Concerns regarding potential traffic increases were raised, particularly from local resident Joan Wolf, who expressed worries about the impact on Highland Drive. However, council members noted that the existing zoning for the rear parcel would remain unchanged, alleviating some traffic concerns.

The council discussed the rationale behind the proposed R2-10 zoning, which allows for a maximum of three units on the 0.443-acre parcel. Some council members questioned why the zoning was not set to R1-8 instead, which would permit fewer units. The response indicated that the R2-10 designation was necessary to meet the density requirements outlined in the Highland Drive Master Plan.

Public comments reflected a mix of support and concern. Some residents expressed sympathy for the applicant's situation, while others cautioned against the potential for future development if the property were sold. The discussion highlighted the delicate balance between preserving the historic character of the neighborhood and accommodating growth.

The council will continue to consider the proposal, weighing the benefits of the rezone against community concerns about traffic and future development possibilities.