In a tense government meeting, a member expressed frustration over communication issues that hindered their ability to conduct interviews for upcoming appointments. The member highlighted that they had not received crucial emails since September, which included the names of candidates they were expected to evaluate.

Despite the member's insistence that they could not fairly vote without prior knowledge of the candidates, the chairperson emphasized the need to proceed with the scheduled interviews. The chair acknowledged the member's email difficulties and assured them that IT support would assist in resolving the issue. However, the chair also pointed out that the meeting would continue as planned, reiterating that the process would follow established protocols.

The discussion underscored a significant procedural conflict, as the member argued for fairness in the voting process, while the chair maintained that the meeting's agenda must be adhered to. The situation reflects ongoing challenges in communication within the board, raising questions about the effectiveness of internal processes and the implications for candidate evaluations.