Planning Commission Approves Controversial Waterfront Development Plan

November 12, 2024 | Coeur d'Alene, Kootenai County, Idaho


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Planning Commission Approves Controversial Waterfront Development Plan
The Planning and Zoning Commission convened on November 12 to discuss a proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment for the Atlas Waterfront Property, owned by Ignite CDA and Riverfest LLC, with Phil Boyd as the applicant. The commission reviewed findings of fact, confirming that procedural requirements, including public notice and hearings, were satisfactorily met.

The proposed development aligns with the city’s comprehensive land use plan, which emphasizes maintaining a high quality of life, enhancing the area's beauty, and providing diverse recreational options. The project aims to balance housing and employment while ensuring high-quality infrastructure and supporting a multimodal transportation system, including provisions for bicycles and pedestrians.

The Atlas property is bordered by the Spokane River, Southeast Way, Riverstone, and River's Edge Apartments, with surrounding land uses comprising multifamily and single-family residences, open spaces, and commercial areas. The commission noted that the proposed modifications would not adversely affect the city’s ability to provide public services or the existing natural features of the site.

The amendment maintains a minimum of 25% open space, exceeding the required 10%, and ensures adequate parking for the development's users. The Atlas Waterfront Property Association will oversee the maintenance of common areas.

However, during the meeting, concerns were raised regarding the site's soil stability. One commissioner expressed reservations about the compatibility of the proposal with the natural features of the site, citing the unpredictable nature of the soils and the potential for structural issues, such as sinkholes. This commissioner advocated for a revision of the conclusions to reflect these concerns before any construction begins.

Ultimately, the Planning and Zoning Commission concluded that the PUD amendment complies with the necessary evaluations and should be approved, contingent upon the conditions outlined in the staff recommendations.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Comments