Whistleblower reveals shocking UAP cover-up by Pentagon
November 13, 2024 | Oversight and Reform: House Committee, Standing Committees - House & Senate, Congressional Hearings Compilation
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
In a recent government oversight committee meeting, significant discussions emerged regarding Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) and alleged government disinformation efforts. Witnesses, including former Department of Defense officials, expressed concerns about the withholding of UAP-related information and the credibility of whistleblowers.
One witness recounted a meeting with the Department of Defense's All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, describing it as an \"influence operation\" aimed at discrediting valid UAP reports, including the well-known Tic Tac incident. This witness emphasized that attempts were made to convince him that the Tic Tac incident involved American technology, despite testimonies from credible witnesses suggesting otherwise.
The committee also addressed the frequency of UAP sightings over military installations, with one witness asserting a historical correlation between UAP activity and sensitive U.S. military sites, including nuclear facilities. He highlighted that this issue has persisted for decades, yet information has been obscured from congressional oversight.
Additionally, a new whistleblower was mentioned, claiming the existence of a classified program focused on the recovery and reverse engineering of UAP technologies. The witness confirmed the program's name through multiple sources, indicating a broader initiative that includes human intelligence.
Concerns were raised about the Pentagon's use of psychological operations officers to manage UAP inquiries, with witnesses alleging that this practice has led to the dissemination of misleading information to the public. One witness characterized UAPs as an \"enigma\" and a potential intelligence failure if they represent adversarial technology.
The meeting underscored a growing frustration among committee members regarding the lack of transparency and accountability in UAP-related matters, with calls for the disclosure of non-sensitive information to Congress and the public. Witnesses expressed a belief that significant information exists that could be shared without compromising national security, emphasizing the need for a more open dialogue on UAPs and their implications for national defense.
One witness recounted a meeting with the Department of Defense's All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, describing it as an \"influence operation\" aimed at discrediting valid UAP reports, including the well-known Tic Tac incident. This witness emphasized that attempts were made to convince him that the Tic Tac incident involved American technology, despite testimonies from credible witnesses suggesting otherwise.
The committee also addressed the frequency of UAP sightings over military installations, with one witness asserting a historical correlation between UAP activity and sensitive U.S. military sites, including nuclear facilities. He highlighted that this issue has persisted for decades, yet information has been obscured from congressional oversight.
Additionally, a new whistleblower was mentioned, claiming the existence of a classified program focused on the recovery and reverse engineering of UAP technologies. The witness confirmed the program's name through multiple sources, indicating a broader initiative that includes human intelligence.
Concerns were raised about the Pentagon's use of psychological operations officers to manage UAP inquiries, with witnesses alleging that this practice has led to the dissemination of misleading information to the public. One witness characterized UAPs as an \"enigma\" and a potential intelligence failure if they represent adversarial technology.
The meeting underscored a growing frustration among committee members regarding the lack of transparency and accountability in UAP-related matters, with calls for the disclosure of non-sensitive information to Congress and the public. Witnesses expressed a belief that significant information exists that could be shared without compromising national security, emphasizing the need for a more open dialogue on UAPs and their implications for national defense.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
View full meeting