Election Data Lockdown Sparks Trust Crisis in Utah

November 04, 2024 | Phil Lyman (R), Utah Governor Race, 2024 -2025 Utah Citizen Journalism, Elections, Utah


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Election Data Lockdown Sparks Trust Crisis in Utah
In a recent meeting of the Utah County Board of Canvassers, discussions surrounding the integrity of the recent elections revealed significant concerns regarding the transparency of election data. The meeting highlighted surprising trends in election results, particularly in the races involving Spencer Cox and Phil Lyman, which raised questions among attendees about the legitimacy of the voting process.

Charts presented during the meeting illustrated a stark contrast in voting patterns. While a typical race between Ricky Hatch and Tina Cannon showed expected fluctuations in ballot batches, the races involving Cox and Lyman exhibited unusual anomalies. Notably, the data indicated a dramatic 32% drop in support for Cox on election day, a shift described as being over nine standard deviations from the norm—an occurrence deemed statistically significant and indicative of potential irregularities.

Experts consulted during the meeting expressed mixed opinions on the data's implications. One statistician suggested that the trends appeared suspicious, while another maintained a more cautious stance, acknowledging the need for further investigation. The discussion intensified when it was revealed that the Lieutenant Governor had instructed county clerks not to release election data, a move that many interpreted as a red flag for transparency.

The lack of accessible election data in Utah, particularly in comparison to other states where such information is readily available, has fueled public distrust. A recent poll indicated that approximately 70% of Utah residents do not trust the integrity of the elections, underscoring a growing concern about the electoral process.

Advocates for transparency argue that without open access to election data, public confidence in the electoral system will continue to erode. They call for a thorough investigation into the anomalies observed in the election results and emphasize that transparency is essential for restoring trust in the electoral process. As discussions continue, the demand for accountability and clarity in Utah's elections remains a pressing issue.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Comments

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Utah articles free in 2025

    Excel Chiropractic
    Excel Chiropractic
    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI