Dispute over business ownership leads to child support showdown

October 30, 2024 | Utah Appellate Court Collection, Utah Family Law District Court Collection, Utah District Courts, Utah Judicial Branch, Utah


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Dispute over business ownership leads to child support showdown
In a recent government meeting, significant discrepancies emerged regarding the financial dealings of Roy and Meredith McGarry, raising concerns about potential income concealment and improper business expense deductions. The discussions highlighted conflicting statements from both parties about their ownership stakes in a ranching business, with evidence suggesting that their claims do not align with corporate records filed in Utah.

The meeting revealed that Meredith McGarry introduced her ownership stake for the first time during the proceedings, which had not been previously disclosed. This inconsistency, coupled with the couple's conflicting testimonies about their partnership dynamics, has led to questions about the legitimacy of their financial reporting. Roy McGarry claimed a 50/50 joint venture, while Meredith suggested she was not a controlling partner, creating a complex narrative that complicates the court's assessment.

A critical point of contention was the depreciation of farm losses through Iron Mountain, a Utah construction company, rather than through their ranching business, McGarry Land and Livestock. Critics argue that this practice is not only inappropriate but also serves to artificially lower Roy McGarry's reported income, which is crucial for child support calculations. The meeting underscored that personal expenses related to leisure activities, such as camping and horseback riding, were improperly categorized as business expenses, further clouding the financial picture.

The implications of these findings are significant. If the court accepts the argument that the McGarrys have been misrepresenting their income and expenses, it could lead to a reassessment of child support obligations. The evidence presented suggests that Roy McGarry's actual income could be substantially higher than the $32,000 per month he claims, potentially reaching $72,000 when accounting for undisclosed income and proper expense deductions.

As the meeting concluded, the focus remained on the need for a thorough review of the McGarrys' financial practices to ensure compliance with Utah's legal standards regarding business expenses and income reporting. The outcome of this scrutiny could have lasting effects on the McGarrys' financial responsibilities and their overall business operations.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Comments

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Utah articles free in 2025

    Excel Chiropractic
    Excel Chiropractic
    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI