During a recent city council meeting, concerns were raised regarding the controversial Clean and Safe program, which has faced criticism for its impact on small businesses and the oversight of its security operations. Brian Conley, a candidate for district 3, questioned the wisdom of binding the incoming city council to a five-year contract with Clean and Safe, particularly given the program's contentious history and the upcoming budget constraints.

Conley highlighted previous criticisms from various stakeholders, including business leaders who have expressed concerns about the program's financial transparency and its effectiveness in revitalizing downtown Portland. He urged commissioners to reconsider their commitment to the program, suggesting that it could hinder the new council's ability to address pressing issues facing the city.

John, another participant in the meeting, echoed these concerns, focusing on the security aspect of Clean and Safe. He criticized the influence of wealthy developers on city policy and pointed to allegations of abuse by security personnel associated with the program. John referenced a recent civil liability case involving a Clean and Safe board member and raised alarms about the conduct of security guards, including connections to extremist groups and questionable practices in managing homeless populations.

The discussions reflect a growing unease among community members regarding the effectiveness and accountability of the Clean and Safe program, as well as its implications for the future governance of Portland. As the city prepares for a significant transition in leadership, the call for a reevaluation of such contracts may shape the priorities of the incoming council.