In a recent government meeting, officials discussed the implications of proposed amendments regarding the use of recreational vehicles (RVs) as permanent dwellings in the county. The meeting, held during the peak of fire season, aimed to gather insights from fire districts and the public, resulting in a record closure on November 1st. Approximately 60 written comments were received, with testimony split evenly between supporters and opponents of the amendments.

Supporters argued that allowing RVs as permanent housing would provide essential options for residents amid a housing crisis, offering financial benefits to property owners and a legal avenue for those currently living in RVs illegally. Conversely, opponents raised concerns about enforcement capabilities, potential impacts on property values, wildfire risks, and landlord-tenant legal issues.

Testimony from the community development department highlighted the challenges of enforcing regulations, particularly regarding the inspection of RVs, which are not classified as permanent structures under current building codes. This classification means RVs would not be subject to the same safety and environmental standards as accessory dwelling units (ADUs), raising alarms about health and safety.

The Central Oregon Fire Chiefs Association expressed concerns about their capacity to manage inspections and enforcement related to the proposed RV program. They suggested that RVs should adhere to the same permit requirements as ADUs to ensure safety and compliance. The building official also voiced opposition, emphasizing that RVs lack the necessary safety and durability standards required for permanent dwellings.

The meeting underscored the need for a comprehensive approach to address the potential risks associated with RVs, particularly in wildfire-prone areas. Discussions included the possibility of implementing local standards for defensible space around RVs, although this would require additional resources and planning.

As the county navigates these complex issues, officials are tasked with balancing the urgent need for housing solutions against the imperative of maintaining safety and community standards. The outcome of these discussions will significantly impact local housing policies and fire safety regulations moving forward.