During a recent government meeting, county officials expressed deep concerns regarding the significant reduction in services for senior citizens, particularly in meal delivery and active living centers. The discussion was sparked by a public comment highlighting the drastic cutback from five meals a week to just one, raising alarms about the safety and well-being of seniors who rely on these services not only for nutrition but also as vital social interactions.

Barb Chisholm from the sheriff's department was recognized for her five years of service, while Christine Harter, who has served for 30 years at the jail, was acknowledged in her absence. However, the mood shifted as a member of the public voiced frustration over the diminishing support for seniors, noting that the county's commitment appears to be waning. The speaker emphasized that meals serve as a crucial safety check for isolated seniors, and the reduction in service could lead to dire consequences.

County commissioners responded, recounting their attempts to engage with the agency responsible for senior services, which has recently transitioned to a separate entity. They expressed disappointment over the agency's refusal to accept additional funding offered by the county to restore meal services. Tensions were evident as commissioners described a recent meeting with the agency's director, who they felt displayed unprofessional behavior and a lack of willingness to collaborate.

The commissioners also highlighted a communication breakdown, stating they were not adequately informed about the cuts until they were already in effect. They plan to meet with the agency's board to address these issues further and encourage public participation in an upcoming meeting scheduled for December 5th in Great Bend, where community members can voice their concerns.

The overarching sentiment among the officials was one of urgency and frustration, as they called for greater accountability and commitment to the senior population, which is rapidly growing in the county. They urged the public to advocate for better funding and services, emphasizing that the treatment of seniors should be a priority for the community and its leaders.