During a recent government meeting, officials revisited a petition to vacate a portion of Hartley Drive, a topic previously discussed in the last session. The petition, submitted by property owners Mr. and Mrs. Titsy, seeks to vacate a section of a platted road that is currently privately maintained and not publicly accessible.

The highway engineer presented findings from a site visit, emphasizing that the area in question is not maintained by the county, contrasting it with adjacent public roads that receive funding and maintenance. The engineer's recommendation was to deny the petition, citing the potential future use of the road as a transportation asset. He noted that while the road may not be utilized for public access currently, it could serve as a vital transportation route in the future.

The discussion included details about the road's layout, including a 20-foot easement that remains unextinguished, suggesting that the area could still be developed into a public road. The engineer highlighted the importance of maintaining access to this easement should the board decide to vacate the area.

Ultimately, the board was urged to consider the long-term implications of vacating the road, as it could hinder future transportation developments. The meeting concluded with a call for a decision on the petition, with the highway engineer reiterating his recommendation to deny the request based on the potential future utility of the road.