During a recent Worcester city council meeting, residents voiced strong opposition to a proposed measure, referred to as item 10 L, which would impose additional requirements on candidates for city council regarding citizenship documentation. The discussions highlighted concerns over perceived discrimination against naturalized citizens.

Lillian, a long-time Worcester resident, expressed her disappointment that the measure was even on the agenda. She criticized the proposal for creating a distinction between naturalized citizens, who would need to provide documentation, and those born in the U.S., who would not. Lillian argued that this requirement unfairly categorizes naturalized citizens as second-class citizens and called for a uniform requirement for all candidates.

Andrew, another resident, echoed these sentiments, labeling the proposal as \"xenophobic\" and \"racist.\" He pointed out the overwhelming opposition from the community, noting that only a few individuals supported the measure while approximately 45 residents spoke against it. He emphasized the value of diversity in Worcester and urged the council to reject the proposal.

Michelle, a resident from district 5, also condemned the measure, describing it as disrespectful to immigrants and calling for a more welcoming environment in the city. She criticized those who brought the measure forward and suggested that the council should focus on more pressing issues, such as providing free parking at the library.

The meeting underscored a significant community backlash against the proposed measure, with residents advocating for inclusivity and support for the immigrant population in Worcester. As the council deliberates, the voices of the community remain clear: they seek to uphold the values of diversity and equality in local governance.