In a recent government meeting, council members engaged in a robust discussion regarding the future of fluoride in the community's water supply. The conversation centered around the potential for a temporary suspension of fluoride addition, with some council members advocating for a permanent cessation.
Councilman Price highlighted the historical context, noting that fluoride was initially banned by voter ballot in 1964, only to be reinstated in 2000. He expressed a desire to return the decision to voters, emphasizing the importance of public input in such health-related matters. He suggested that if the council decides to put the issue to a vote, it should clearly outline the implications of adding fluoride versus maintaining its absence.
Several council members voiced concerns about the safety and legality of continuing fluoride addition, especially in light of new information and ongoing court cases regarding naturally occurring fluoride. Councilman Yates proposed a two-year temporary suspension, allowing time for further research and potential guidance from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). He argued that if the council is concerned enough to pause fluoride addition, it should consider stopping it altogether.
The discussion also touched on the timing of any potential ballot initiatives, with suggestions to revisit the issue in August 2025 to align with upcoming election cycles. Council members expressed a consensus on the need for a temporary measure while also recognizing the urgency of addressing public health concerns.
Ultimately, the council agreed to draft a temporary ordinance for a 24-month suspension of fluoride addition, with plans to revisit the possibility of a permanent cessation in the near future. The meeting underscored the council's commitment to public health and the importance of community engagement in decision-making processes.