In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around the ongoing challenges of homelessness in Portland, particularly in relation to the city’s compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) following a settlement. John De Lorenzo, attorney for the plaintiffs in the Tozer versus the city of Portland case, highlighted the city’s financial commitment to removing encampments from sidewalks, which has improved accessibility for individuals with disabilities. However, he criticized the county's tent and tarp distribution policies, stating that for every two tents removed, one new tent is placed, undermining the city’s efforts.

De Lorenzo pointed out that the county chair had previously promised to suspend tent purchases but later published a policy that contradicted this commitment. He argued that the city has been proactive in addressing homelessness through practical strategies, such as expanding shelter services and curtailing tent distribution, while the county has ignored agreed-upon milestones from the settlement. He urged the city to reconsider its financial support for the joint office, suggesting that funds could be better utilized elsewhere.

Tiana Tozer, a lead plaintiff in the ADA lawsuit, shared a personal story about the isolation faced by individuals with disabilities, emphasizing the dire circumstances many find themselves in. She expressed frustration over the county's failure to meet the terms of the negotiated settlement, asserting that the county's actions have neglected the needs of over 59,000 residents with disabilities in Portland. Tozer called for a reevaluation of the partnership with the joint office, advocating for more effective use of city funds to support all citizens, particularly those with disabilities.

The meeting underscored the tension between city and county policies regarding homelessness and the urgent need for collaborative solutions that prioritize the needs of vulnerable populations.