During a recent city council meeting, public comments focused heavily on the contentious Measure D, with several speakers expressing strong opposition to the proposed tax measure. The meeting began with City Clerk Duarte confirming six speakers had signed up to address the council, each allotted three minutes to share their views.

The first speaker criticized the city’s promotional materials for Measure D, claiming they presented a biased perspective favoring the measure without adequate debate or analysis. He questioned the city’s spending on campaign materials and the lack of transparency regarding the financial implications of Measure D, particularly in relation to police funding. He urged the council to commit to using funds from Measure D specifically for police services, highlighting that despite previous tax measures, the number of patrol officers had not increased.

The second speaker echoed these sentiments, labeling Measure D as a deceptive tax that would not guarantee additional police officers. He called for the hiring of 19 new officers and a consistent pay increase for existing police personnel, criticizing the council for what he perceived as empty promises regarding police support.

A third speaker shifted the focus slightly, addressing the broader implications of recent changes in the criminal justice system under Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascon. He noted a perceived shift in favor of victims' rights and suggested that recent legislative changes might be a response to public pressure against Gascon's earlier policies.

The meeting underscored a growing discontent among residents regarding local governance and public safety funding, with calls for accountability and transparency from the city council. As the council prepares to vote on Measure D, the community's concerns about police funding and the effectiveness of tax measures remain at the forefront of public discourse.