Residents of North Auburn voiced significant concerns during a recent government meeting regarding the proposed Highway 49 Wastewater Capacity Improvement Project, particularly focusing on public safety and environmental risks associated with naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) in the area.

Steven Hutchins, a local resident, highlighted what he described as numerous errors and misrepresentations in the project's mitigation negative declaration, which was approved last November. He emphasized that the project involves excavation in areas with a high likelihood of encountering hazardous materials, including asbestos, which he claims were not adequately disclosed to residents. Hutchins criticized the county's dust mitigation measures, stating they would only be implemented after asbestos is detected, potentially exposing workers and the community to airborne toxins.

Other residents echoed Hutchins' concerns, stressing the need for more thorough geological studies and community engagement before proceeding with the project. Karen Nader, another local, pointed out that the urgency of the project, driven by overcapacity in the wastewater system, had left little room for public input. She urged county officials to prioritize community involvement in future decisions that significantly impact residents.

The meeting also addressed the financial pressures surrounding the project, with officials noting that they must utilize approximately $9.5 million in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds by the end of the year to avoid losing the funding. This urgency has complicated the decision-making process, as officials balance the need for timely action against community concerns.

County representatives acknowledged the residents' frustrations regarding notification and communication about the project. They committed to improving outreach efforts and ensuring that mitigation measures for asbestos are adequately addressed. The discussion underscored the challenges of managing infrastructure projects while safeguarding public health and maintaining community trust.

As the project moves forward, residents remain vigilant, advocating for stricter oversight and transparency to protect their health and environment.