In a recent design review committee meeting, discussions centered around a proposed new construction project at 115 Winslow Bridal, presented by architect Michael Kitsadis of MK Studio. The project aims to create a custom home characterized by whimsical French cottage elements, including swooped and arched roofs. However, the design has raised concerns among committee members regarding its compatibility with the historic character of the neighborhood.

Committee staff highlighted several key issues with the proposed design, noting that the building's height exceeds the recommended guidelines by 17%, standing at 29 feet and 10 inches compared to the average block height of 25 feet and 6 inches. Additionally, the scale and mass of the new structure were deemed disproportionate to the surrounding historic buildings, with members expressing that it appears \"heavier\" and more prominent than its neighbors.

Specific design elements, such as the orientation of the front porch and the complexity of the roof form, were also criticized for not aligning with the traditional architectural rhythm of the area. The recessed entryway and large windows were described as inconsistent with the neighborhood's aesthetic, prompting calls for adjustments to better reflect the guidelines.

Kitsadis acknowledged the feedback and indicated a willingness to modify the design, suggesting a potential reduction in height by altering the roof structure. However, committee members emphasized that multiple aspects of the design would require reevaluation to achieve a more harmonious integration with the historic context.

The meeting also included a review of previously approved alterations at 111 Winslow Road, where applicant Kevin Coffey discussed plans to maintain the existing footprint while making interior modifications. The proposal includes replacing vertical siding with lap siding and addressing structural issues with a fin wall that had recently collapsed. While some committee members supported the direction of the project, there was a consensus that further evidence would be needed to justify the removal of the fin wall, which had been previously denied.

Overall, the discussions underscored the committee's commitment to preserving the historic integrity of the neighborhood while balancing the need for modern development. The applicants were encouraged to refine their designs in response to the feedback provided, ensuring that new constructions respect the visual characteristics and guidelines established for the area.