During a recent meeting of the DC Everest School District, community members voiced strong opposition to proposed changes to Title IX regulations, particularly those expanding protections based on gender identity. Cindy Russell, a local resident, emphasized that the original Title IX, enacted in 1972, was designed to protect women and girls, arguing that the Biden administration's interpretation undermines these protections by allowing biological males who identify as females to access girls' sports, locker rooms, and scholarships. She expressed concerns over safety and privacy for female students, stating that the new rules could lead to significant changes in school policies that historically safeguarded girls.

Maggie Cronin, a staff member for Congressman Tom Tiffany, echoed these sentiments, claiming that the federal government is imposing a transgender ideology that threatens the integrity of educational environments. She highlighted past actions by the Department of Agriculture, which allegedly threatened funding for schools that did not comply with gender-inclusive bathroom policies. Cronin also mentioned Tiffany's support for legislative measures aimed at protecting women in sports and preventing the sexualization of children.

Another community member, James Edith, criticized the school board's communication regarding the new Title IX policy, arguing that it misrepresented the nature of the changes. He pointed out that the new regulations redefine \"sex\" to include gender identity, which he and others view as a departure from traditional definitions based on biological sex.

The discussions reflect a broader national debate on gender identity and its implications for educational policies, with local stakeholders expressing fears about the potential impact on students' rights and safety. The school district is now faced with the challenge of addressing these concerns while navigating the evolving legal landscape surrounding Title IX.